Skip to main content

Notes on Samuel Huntington's The Clash of Civilizations

A general picture of Huntington's argument:
  •  Great division among humankind will be cultural instead of ideological and primarily economic.
  • Non-Western civilizations no longer remain the objects of history as targets of Western colonialism but join the West as movers and shapers of history.
  • Civilization: Highest cultural grouping people, broadest level of cultural identity people that distinguishes humans from other species.
  • Two major variants: European-North American
  • Islam has its three subdivisions: Arab, Turkic and Malay.
  • Civilizations differ from each other by history, language, culture, tradition and religion.
  • Cultural identity turns into civilization consciousness.
  • Why civilizations will crash?

o   Differences among civilizations have generated the most prolonged and the most violent conflicts.
o   Increasing interactions intensify civilization consciousness and awareness of differences between civilizations and commonalities within civilizations.
o   Economic modernization and social change weaken the national state as a source of identity and this provides a basis for broader ‘civilization’ identity.
o   Westernization provides a return to roots of the civilization. It makes people also desire to identify themselves different.
o   Cultural characteristics cannot be converted to another identity and this strengthens the devotion to the belonging civilization. The question was ‘which side are you on?’ but now ‘What are you?’ No half/half persons.
o   Successful economic regionalism will reinforce civilization-consciousness.
  • People define themselves ‘us’ in religious and ethnic  terms while define others as ‘them’
  • The efforts of the West to promote its values of democracy and liberalism as universal values, to maintain military predominance and to advance its economic interests.
  • The clash occurs in two levels: micro-level, macro-level.
  • Fault line between civilizations.
  • In the Arab world, Western democracy strengthens anti-Western political forces.
  • Differences in power and struggles for military, economic and institutional power are one source of conflict between the West and other civilizations.
  • Differences in culture (basic values and beliefs) are second source of conflict.
  • The West induces other peoples to adopt Western ideas concerning democracy and human rights.
  • They have to either isolate themselves from the World or join the West and accept its values or balance it by modernize but no westernize.
  • Torn country: they want to join but they can’t because of historical, cultural and traditional aspects. (Turkey, Mexico, Russia)
  • To redefine their civilization identity torn countries must meet three requirements:

o   The support and enthusiasm of economic and political elite.
o   The public has to accept even if they don’t want.
o   The dominant groups have to be willing to convert
  • Western civilization is both Western and modern. Non-western civilizations have attempted to become modern without becoming Western. (p.49)
  • There will be no universal civilization, but instead a world of different civilizations.

Popular posts from this blog

Philosophy as the father of science

Philosophy was long regarded as the sole method of thought that would explain phenomena, be it imaginary, concrete, celestial, or terrestrial. Aristotle was a biologist, if we look at his work from today's perspective. He was mainly interested in the species that scattered all over the places. His concern was to collect as many different animals and plants as possible, so that he would have been able to talk about them with greater certainty. However, he was also a strong advocate of categorization and in order to categorize what he had collected, he needed to contemplate on what to put in this or that category or on what makes two things different. This contemplation made him a philosopher, as we understand it today.

Clearing up doubts

Humans want to be sure about what they believe in, but those who give their will to another’s hands can never get rid of doubts. Doubts are infections in the heart and the heart needs a constant treatment of Faith conducted by reasoning. Humans are expected to clear up doubts in their hearts with sound arguments.

Multiple Histories of Capital

  In his chapter on Marx’s critique on capital, Dipesh Chakrabarti ( Provincializing Europe : Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference, Princeton 2000) tries to deal with the idea that provincialized Europe has a universal and overarching character. Marx criticized capital on two categories: the abstract human and the idea of history. As historicism assumes that capital arose in Europe out of the Enlightenment rationalism and humanism, it constitutes a unity both in time and space. For Chakrabarti, and Marx, the main reason behind this assumption is the need for a homogenous and common unit for measuring human activity. This measurement will of course be designed to reduce diversity and human belongings into one category called ‘labor’. Abstract labor, therefore, is to destroy differences among workers. Abstract labor is abstracted from any empirical history, it is like a ghost. However, paradoxically, capital is in need of a human, concrete, labor in advance in order