Skip to main content

Emergence of European Identity

A good piece of analysis on the emergence of European/Western identity:
“The process by which people in the West came to define what made their own civilization distinctive among the civilizations of the world entailed drawing a series of sharp contrasts between what they noww began to see as Western and what they began to see as non-Western. These contrasts delienated those characteristics and virtues which Europeans were coming to see as unique to Western civilization, especially in its modern form, and which they thought accounted for its increasing power, wealth and knowledge. Conversely, it was other societies’ lack of these characteristics, these core values and traits, that made them weak and backward and that thus both facilitated and justified Western domination. In the course of defining who they were not and who their ‘others’ were, Europeans simultaneously defined and consolidated their own identity.”
Zachary Lockman, Contending Visions of the Middle East

Popular posts from this blog

Camus's Absurd End

"Camus was only 46 when he died in an automobile accident. Ironically, he had once said that he could not imagine a death more meaningless than dying in a car accident." From Understanding Philosophy, Joan A. Price

The Civilization of Clash - A Critique

Samuel Huntington, the writer of ‘The Clash of Civilizations’ article, imagines a disagreement between major cultures of the world. He suggests, for the future, a certain separation between civilizations that cannot be avoided. Through the centuries, a fault line between civilizations was created by the different views of God and man, the individual and the group, and so on. This line is also gradually growing because of the unbearable Western military, economic and cultural superiority to others. The line will not soon disappear because it is more fundamental than the separation created by political approaches.

Thankfulness

A man entered the room interrupting the class: ‘O master, your merchant ships sunk in the middle of the sea!’ The Master replied  ‘thank God’ . After a while, the same man came and said ‘they were someone else’s, not yours’ The master replied again ‘ thank God ’. His disciples curiously asked him the reason he replied both in the same manner. He said ‘Neither former news upset me nor the latter pleased. It was not my loss because the ships were in fact my Lord’s, not mine. There is no profit for me either, because they are still not mine. Therefore, I thank God for freeing my soul from which do not belong to me.’