Skip to main content

Philosophy as the father of science

Philosophy was long regarded as the sole method of thought that would explain phenomena, be it imaginary, concrete, celestial, or terrestrial. Aristotle was a biologist, if we look at his work from today's perspective. He was mainly interested in the species that scattered all over the places. His concern was to collect as many different animals and plants as possible, so that he would have been able to talk about them with greater certainty. However, he was also a strong advocate of categorization and in order to categorize what he had collected, he needed to contemplate on what to put in this or that category or on what makes two things different. This contemplation made him a philosopher, as we understand it today.

His master, Plato, was no different in this respect. His basic concern was to understand the universe and humans within it. But his method was drastically different. For him, in order to figure out what things are and how they work, we needed to seek for universal ideas, which covers (or operates) everything. Hence Plato came up with the idea of Ideas, namely the universal realities. The world surrounding us could only be an aggravate of reflections of those Ideas because it lacked perfection. It was corrupted. To understand these reflections in their perfect state, we needed to contact with those Ideas.

For both of the founding fathers of the Western philosophy, Plato and Aristotle, philosophical inquiry inevitably involves in scientific investigation. Even though their approaches are different (some even claim that they are complete opposites), they shared the same concern: understanding the world surrounding us by way of investigation.

Popular posts from this blog

Camus's Absurd End

"Camus was only 46 when he died in an automobile accident. Ironically, he had once said that he could not imagine a death more meaningless than dying in a car accident." From Understanding Philosophy, Joan A. Price

The Civilization of Clash - A Critique

Samuel Huntington, the writer of ‘The Clash of Civilizations’ article, imagines a disagreement between major cultures of the world. He suggests, for the future, a certain separation between civilizations that cannot be avoided. Through the centuries, a fault line between civilizations was created by the different views of God and man, the individual and the group, and so on. This line is also gradually growing because of the unbearable Western military, economic and cultural superiority to others. The line will not soon disappear because it is more fundamental than the separation created by political approaches.

Notes on Samuel Huntington's The Clash of Civilizations

A general picture of Huntington's argument:   Great division among humankind will be cultural instead of ideological and primarily economic. Non-Western civilizations no longer remain the objects of history as targets of Western colonialism but join the West as movers and shapers of history. Civilization: Highest cultural grouping people, broadest level of cultural identity people that distinguishes humans from other species. Two major variants: European-North American Islam has its three subdivisions: Arab, Turkic and Malay. Civilizations differ from each other by history, language, culture, tradition and religion. Cultural identity turns into civilization consciousness. Why civilizations will crash?